Steve wrote:
> 
> you can still update and remain within the 
> constraints of a 486 

Yes, I could update netstat to get the added features you are 
talking about.  And, yes, I would be unlikely to notice any 
deterioration in performance on my 486.  However, if I were to 
update everything, it would definitely hurt my performance.
It's death by a thousand cuts.  An extra feature here, an extra 
parameter there, some extra code to accommodate an obscure
hardware quirk, a compatibility layer for KDE, built-in support
for foreign languages, and on and on.

Four years ago, CLI Linux was mature.  We are not talking about
buggy software.  Since then we have had massive feature-creep
in the kernel, libraries and software.  It takes my 486 an hour
to compile the old 2.0.34 kernel.  I'd hate to think what the
current feature-full kernel would take.  Two hours?  Three hours?

Four-year-old Linux works just fine.  If I want a feature, I 
download the necessary software and compile it for my system.  
For example, I use a recent version of icewm.  However, what
I won't do is a wholesale upgrade, where I get a truckload of 
useless features that do nothing for me but slow down my 486.

Cheers,
Steven

Reply via email to