On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:08:19 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:15:46 +0300, Mithgol the Webmaster wrote:
>> P.S. I've checked it before posting the email; >> Arachne is still v1.70rev3. > Yep, that's it. Nothing on the Arachne front whatsoever. Maybe > Michael is busy with his various responsibilities. > I certainly wish him all the best. And so do I. Let us remember what Michael gets out of Arachne: . . . . . Yup. All that. And complants too. It's a bit easier to keep your interest and enthusiasm up when at least you are making headway and receiving some appreciation. When it looks like the chosen platform is dead, you REALLY have to be a masochist to keep at it. <g> Fear not. Plan B is in place. <G> - Clarence Verge - Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
