On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:24:53 -0600, "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks; > This may be a naive question, but I'm curious. Most of the limitations > of DOS that I see, seem to be imposed upon it, such as lack of further > developement. It looks to me to be a concerted effort to kill it. Is it > dead due to inherent flaws in the system or because the wealthiest man > in the world, with extreme power and influence over government, military, > technological, and corporate entities says it's dead? Hi Rob; I thought we had agreed that you had brought it back to life. <g> Lack of development of DOS is not the problem, it's the lack of development of new applications for DOS. BG might want to convince his sheep that DOS no longer even exists in the M$ pasture, and his brainwashing of the public servant sector makes communication with your elected officials almost impossible unless you use one of his latest atrocities, but I doubt the purpose is to kill DOS. DOS is already playing dead. He just wants to ship more Wincrap. - Clarence Verge. -- Using Arachne 1.66 on DSL.
