Cristian Burneci wrote: > > Clarence Verge wrote: > <snip> > > > > And I have to comment that the examples Cristian has provided here and > > in a previous message obviously make a case AGAINST "C" by a programmer > > familiar with that language. Possibly SO familiar that they are even > > worse than the average "joe" would do.
> snip > I noticed > that the "for" loop gave worse results than the "while" loop. I took the > two "while" based little chunks of code and sent them to the list for > comparison (I'was a little selfish here, boring all the list members > with that Computer Chinese and I apologize again). So, you see, I believe > I am not unaware of how I write my code :-) Hi Cristian; I hope I didn't seem to imply that. :( I meant exactly the opposite. <G> I see it did not come out right. You are SO obviously aware of how the code you write will come out that I thought you were consciously directing the result to provide one or more examples which were heavier than the Borland example. The use of the bogus "sir" and incrementing thru one character at a time is hardly the thing that "joe" would do, is it ? <G> - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ - The internet is infected - Windows is a VIRUS !! --
