On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:32:15 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:15:41 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> I can't believe that we didn't think of this a looonnnggg time ago. >> Edit idxfast.htp and idxhead.htp >> Just below <body arachne noresize> add this line. >> <arachne nocache> >> There you go: >> No more "old indexes". :))) > Very nice Batman ! <g> > I guess we've been a bit too busy playing elsewhere.<G> > BTW, it seems to me that this works too, and I'm not sure why: > <body arachne nocache noresize> > Is nocache a <body> option ? I'll check thet. BRB ____ Nope. It's *not* a <body> option. > Maybe my test is defective. > Using the OLD wwwman, how can I be sure to get a persistent item that > would NOT persist with the NEW version ? i.e. how to test "nocache" ? Any .htm file generated with the old version of wwwman will not have "nocache". So *will* be cached by core. Any that were created by the new version will have so won't be.<VBG> The same holds true for old vs new (idxfast, idxhead, insight) (old version HTMs will be cached... new ones will not be) _______ (posting to both lists) -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
