On 1 Sep 02 at 15:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Did you read the new changes.txt ???? > >Well, here it is for the whole world to see. >(the release date will now need to be changed) ;-)
Hi list, if this is true and Arachne 1.71 actually exists, then it is really great and makes Arachne a first choice browser again. And IMO it will not matter matter whether it is green or blue. I have no idea what the colour or interface controversy is about. I would neither need not like any 1.71 "preview" that could on the other hand confuse Arachne beginners. But I recall that most of Clarence's proposals were reflecting on low resource PC, low resource video or keyboard oriented users. I think this does represent a significant number of Arachne users. Rather than risking a djungle of alternative releases I would however suggest to solve this in the typical arachnoid way - ie. through add-on modules. Wouldn't it be possible to offer an add-on packet with alternative core.exe and a few ah files that can just be installed OVER the latest stable release? Just leave it to the user whether he wants to install "mouse release" or "cat release" of the spider. Many thanks to the whole team! Christof Lange -- (admitting to be really eager not only to test, -- but even to use Arachne 1.71)
