On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> With all the important things that needs to be addressed in Arachne, the
> appearance of a little, insignificant "X" doesn't come close to making the
> list!

> We need:

> ***   Access to secure sites!  (No. 1 priority)

> ***   Javascript capability.  (Only because so many sites use it.)

> Until these are addressed, not one second should be devoted to how an "X"
> appears.

Roger..et al,

Yes...temporarily 1.71pre kills 95% of the httpsPhonies...but we DO
need the SSL support....and....Javasjunk is becoming ubiquitous and
that support is also needed.  1.71pre is a vast improvement over both
1.69 (which I use mostly) and 1.70r3 (which I WOULD use mostly, if
it weren't for that DownloadLoop bug).  

With the httpsSpoof technique expanded to "shell-out" to a DOS DPMI
OpenSSL Engine....true Secure (HTTPS) capability should be able to
be added to Arachne as a plug-in....we already have this general
procedure working when Arachne "shells-out" to use CWDPMI to handle
images....it should be able to be adapted to running an SSL plug-in,
also.

With the IgnoreJS/httpsSpoof "shell-out-to-CWDPMI" technique/procedure
working, we should be able to either adapt the Linux "SpiderMonkey"
JS Engine to Arachne...or adapt the orginal DOS JS Engine (I have it,
but can't remember the name) to be used as an Arachne plug-in....

I think the key point is to keep on using the "shell-out" technique
that Michael adopted for image handling, so that all improvements are
added as plug-ins rather than compiled into CORE.EXE....making it
bloat up to (horrors..!!!!) windgedozzz style...<g>

....gregy


-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client

Reply via email to