> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:01:17 -0500 (EST) > From: "Thomas Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: DOSEMUs
> I remember running Arachne in OS/2 DOSEMU, and it ran but was much slower than > under straight DOS. Apparently the slow part was the modem download, which > seemed 40% to 50% as fast as under straight DOS. I was able to get 800 * 600 > screen resolution in OS/2 DOSEMU, which I hear the Windows NT line including I run Arachne in OS/2 Warp 3 and 4. Did a 4 browser test for download speeds. Arachne was only slightly slower than the fastest, Netscape was slower. If you get slow download speeds, something is not set right. I have dos settings for Arachne available if anyone wants to try it on OS/2. For general speed running Arachne completely in a ramdisk will be the fastest whether in dos or os/2. I have the temp and cache running in a ramdisk with a HPFS file system drive. HPFS is noticably faster than FAT. Reb -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
