At 09:27 21-12-02 -0700, you wrote: >2nd Whoa >(this is different from the 2nd Biblical Woe...<g>...) > >Okay...all hotshot Listers...<g> > >Here is where we need to stop and assess and do some >documentation. > >1. That printer output inconsistency is now fixed..?? >Klas and Bastiaan you both agree that Glenn has made >that "Look and Feel" consistent..?? If so, then, >will Klas and Bastiaan please write a brief text >description of the problem(s) and state that McCorkle >fixed it by, "yada, yada (no need for complicated >technical terms - just "fixed wwwman, etc"....and >email attach a copy to me, and BCC to glennmcc. > >2. Do we have a pretty good idea of where the >problem lies with that "click-on \\ or ALT-F2 >crash" is being caused...?? From the posts, it >seems to be in the w9x DOS after a certain >version. Is this correct..??
Seems to me that pure dos7x in 32 bit FS won't work, while in dosbox windows masquerades a 16 bit FS. The problem is just with the bootsector, if you'd ask me. BRB If it is correct, >then Bastiaan, or someone who has been following >it "intelligently" (not me...I can't reproduce >the problem, so my knowledge is NOT intelligent) >please document which w9xDOS versions work, and >which don't...and email attach that text file >to me....BCC to glennmcc....?? >NOTE - we do NOT absolutely have to have the fix >in hand, AT THIS EXACT TIME...when Glenn gets >wwwman hacked, then we can just make the hacked >wwwman available as a "drop-in-replacement". > >3. Do we have any other outstanding problems >with Arachne1.71ue01, that we KNOW are major, >and we think may be Arachne-caused...?? > >What we need to do, is nail these down, now... >...then we need to "freeze" Arachne v. 1.71ue01 >right now, and pronounce it "ready to release" >Then Glenn can un-comment my endorsement on his >download page, and we can get on with working >on Version 1.71ue02... >. >....gregy > > > >-- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client > >
