Killing in self-defense is rare in this country, and I doubt the
statistics  are available which would separate the instances of LEO vs.
civilian.  As a percentage of total homicides, I doubt it would be
statistically significant.

As to killing "by accident," and having it classified *initially* as
homicide and then "down graded" as you imply could be the case, I doubt
that is a statistically significant amount either.  Rather, the inverse
is true:  Deaths by "accident" are normally reported as accidents, and
then -- after a great deal of investigation and court cases -- changed
to criminal offenses; that number is likely statistically more
significant.

HOWEVER, what is *most* significant is the fact that you cannot rely to
any degree of certainty on statistics maintained at either the national
or the state level when it comes to crimes, crimes of violence,
accidental deaths, or even suicides.  Even ten years ago the majority of
this stuff simply was not considered important enough to waste limited
manhours and limited resources to keep accurate track of; the statistics
maintained at the local level were generally those which constituted a
"hair up his a**e" for whomever was in power at the time.  Even with
today's much less expensive and much faster computerized databases at
the local level, there is no nationwide system or rules or "codes" for
classifying crime.  If there is one thing that is less reliable than
Medicare statistics, it is "crime statistics."

To attempt to compare this year's statistics on crime with those of ten
years ago is like comparing kiwi with nectarines ... when half the
people have never tasted kiwi and nearly that many don't know the
difference between a nectarine and a peach.

l.d.

P.S.  I ran into this problem with nationwide & statewide statistics
when I attempted to compare the number of deaths resulting from "all
aspects" of smoking to those deaths attributable to alcohol; I couldn't
do it, because right now the 'bad guy' is tobacco and no one is keeping
tracable figures on alcohol related deaths -- not even those on the
highway!

====


On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:49:08 +0000 (UTC), Samuel W. Heywood wrote:

>> http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/viort.htm

> The statistics at the above URL could be easily misinterpreted
> because many homicides are not crimes.

> A killing of a human committed in self defense or by accident is a
> homicide, but under those circumstances the homicides are not crimes.

-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/

Reply via email to