On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, L.D. Best wrote
>Whether or not the story were true, I would feel far better if recognized "legit" sources provided the information on the purported crime or hoax, whichever it might be.< Such as? The sites I listed were some of the first that came up when I looked on Google. So many different sites giving the same information, the same details -- not just one or two obscure sites -- indicates to me valid information. Go look for yourself. >Underground "news" sites most often have an agenda of their own, and are -- by definition -- suspect.< And NBC, CBS, etc. don't have their own agendas? "Underground" news deals with issues that the corporate media will not touch -- usually for reasons of corporate policy, not because said issues lack news- worthiness. This doesn't mean the issues are not legitimate, only that the corporate media won't publicize them. Go look at FAIR.ORG for instance after instance of this sort of thing. Terri A. FitzSimons
