On Tue, 27 May 2003 03:13:00 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > It is an accusation regardless. If you should ever receive an email > containing a virus and saying in the "From:" header that it is from me, > that information alone would not provide you with any justifiable > reason for saying that I am apparently the person who sent it to you.
APPARENTLY means it APPEARS to be so, no more no less. So if your name is in the From: field it would APPEAR that the message is from you, or to put it differently the message is APPARENTLY from you. That is NOT the same as saying that the message is ACTUALLY from you, only that it APPEARS to be. > I don't know whether they accused him or whether they advised him. You are accusing THEM of doing something but you now admit you don't know whether they did it or not! You admit that you don't know the facts. You admit that you are only going on your suppositions about what was actually in those messages. On that basis, I don't see that we can have anything fruitful to say about the matter. from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia "Queen City of the South" 34:55S 138:36E http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/greg_mayman/default.htm -- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
