Glenn, I guess that I don't understand. If all a person wants to do is to read a page offline, then it shouldn't make any difference if a dynamic image is changed to static, should it?
Roger Turk Glenn McCorkle wrote: . > Ahhhh..... 'twould be nice if 'twere that easy. ;-) . > However, . > Most web pages use a combination of both "static" and "dynamic" . > addresses for images. (and for links to other pages) . > (static) . > <img src="http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/images/cacheidx.gif"> . > (dynamic) . > <img src="images/cacheidx.gif"> . > When the dynamic address is contained within a page located . > at http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ . > Then the 'completed address' becomes the same as if we had used the . > static address. . > The reason for doing this is for 'portability'. . > The exact same page can be placed at many different . > sites without editing to change a link to a (now local) file. . > So..... . > Doing a 'search and replace' of "http://.." will not 'cut the mustard'. . > -- . > Glenn
