Hi, 
On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 1:17:29 PM UTC+2, Roman wrote:
>
> Sure, I will give you dump of database, I just don't want to put link here 
> publicly, where can I send it to you?
>


You can send it to hackers at arangodb dot com ;-)
 

>
> But I think problem is with filter propagation into traversal. When I use 
> simple filter:
>
> filter p.edges[1].type == 'cdp'
>
> then I can see in explain that it's send to traversal
>
> Traversals on graphs:
>  Id   Depth      Vertex collections   Edge collections   Filter conditions
>   5   1..10000   vDevice              eLink              `Path`.`edges`[1] 
> -> v.`type` == "cdp"
>
> But when I use your suggested filter:
>
> FILTER p.edges[*].type ALL == "cdp" 
>
> Traversals on graphs:
>  Id   Depth      Vertex collections   Edge collections   Filter conditions
>   5   1..10000   vDevice              eLink              
>
> Filter conditions is empty.
>

 Yes, this is not yet possible as I was trying to point out with 'which 
will do what you want. However, performance wise it will gain the ability 
to abort traversals in future ArangoDB releases.'

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ArangoDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to