Thanks. 在 2016年12月15日星期四 UTC+8下午5:21:53，Michael Hackstein写道： > > Hi, > > i think our documentation in this area is not precise enough, we are going > to optimize it there. Thank you for pointing it out. > > > Now to resolve your confusion. > All filters on *e* will only validate if the last edge fulfills the > condition or not. > Especially does this not stop the traverser from checking further down, if > one of the edges violates the condition, the next edge on this path could > fulfill it. > All other edges on the path are allowed to violate the condition. > > Filter on *p *will always validate the complete path. > > And there is the difference in your query: > In AQL 1 you will only find paths where the last edge is of type *typeOne*, > all other edges have arbitrary types. > In AQL 2 all edges are of type *typeOne* > > best > Michael > > > > Am 15.12.2016 um 07:36 schrieb Beansprouts <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > > AQL 1: > for v,e,p in 1..3 any "test_vertex/213124123123" relation_default > filter e._type=="typeOne" > return p > AQL 2: > for v,e,p in 1..3 any "test_vertex/213124123123" relation_default > filter p.edges[*]._type all in ["typeOne"] > return p > > AQL 1 return paths that not all edge matches the filter _type=="typeOne". > but AQL 2 done. > > why filter on e looks like has no effect？ > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ArangoDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ArangoDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
