Wow what a fast response! So this means if I have a 1TB collection I don't need 1TB memory capacity?
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 5:27:42 PM UTC+2, Frank Celler wrote: > > We are currently preparing the 3.2 release. An alpha version will be > available next week that uses a storage engine based on Facebook's RocksDB. > This will give you better performance with large datasets. > > > Am Freitag, 14. April 2017 17:22:37 UTC+2 schrieb Ahmad Ibrahim: >> >> >> >> Hi all, ArangoDB is a very interesting product and I would love to use it >> in my next project but I have just one question, is it suitable for large >> data collections like logs or I still have to use another data storage like >> elastic? As far as I understand ArangoDB is almost in memory database so >> loading such large collection in memory will be a problem.. am I wrong? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ArangoDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
