Thanks for confirming it's working in 3.2. 
Have you had a chance to try recent versions of 3.1 (e.g. 3.1.25) as well?

Thanks
Jan

Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017 10:36:11 UTC+2 schrieb Beansprouts:
>
> Thanks,In ArangoDB 3.2.0 no this problem anymore.
>
> 在 2017年7月24日星期一 UTC+8下午7:13:21,Jan写道:
>>
>> ArangoDB 3.1.4 is more than half a year old.
>> The problem may have been fixed in the meantime.
>> Can you retry the query with a recent version of 3.1? The newest version 
>> is 3.1.25 at the moment.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2017 08:24:01 UTC+2 schrieb Beansprouts:
>>>
>>> I have a aql like this(the aql was generated by code,so a little 
>>> difficult to read):
>>>
>>>  for sv_1 in(let r0_2=( for v_2 in concept_class
>>> Filter v_2['_id'] in 
>>> ["concept_class/40B69814-CF38-966A-0551-979A1A111807"]
>>> SORT v_2['_ShowOrder'] asc 
>>>  return v_2 )
>>> let r1_2=( for v_2 in concept_concrete
>>> Filter v_2['_id'] in 
>>> ["concept_class/40B69814-CF38-966A-0551-979A1A111807"]
>>> SORT v_2['_ShowOrder'] asc 
>>>  return v_2 )
>>> let r2_2=union(r0_2,r1_2) 
>>> for rp_2 in r2_2 return rp_2)
>>>  for v_1,e_1,p_1 in 1 any sv_1 relation_default filter 
>>> p_1.edges[0]._type in
>>>  ["concept_class/07A8C5F5-F026-5EA9-BF22-595302AE2CAF",
>>>  "concept_class/8CCFB04F-B2A5-DE5F-1BDF-9319A28AD9CF",
>>>  "concept_class/46BA1A2C-DC16-D2D6-23E8-AB43C52D6F5A",
>>>  "concept_class/87DA9915-24E2-6A9A-DF4B-79C3B48353FD",
>>>  "concept_class/E603D4F1-6048-322D-3E2E-78AD08753805",
>>>  "concept_class/CD1E874F-42B4-D218-2661-88284A3253DE",
>>>  "concept_class/89302181-1EBC-924E-3C22-FF50FD0E4936",
>>>  "concept_class/attributeValue",
>>>  "concept_class/B46B8072-F0A0-9061-D999-C3846DC8CFC0",
>>>  "concept_class/1E7E8940-2E93-22C6-0409-FE03D14D502F",
>>>  "concept_class/398D9BFD-9C4C-4E79-01B3-38583FC5D7D2",
>>>  "concept_class/2BCCF06D-734C-2DFC-E022-332336B044C4",
>>>  "concept_class/F806300A-E483-913F-C71D-EFD99239D718",
>>>  "concept_class/3C5ADB1F-D692-AA46-593C-57B0C4087C6D",
>>>  "concept_class/168F938B-F86B-4012-A9A8-14CAAA3E169B",
>>>  "concept_class/6EEDD594-CE81-DF05-0E9B-3D517FDB884D",
>>>  "concept_class/attributeDefinition",
>>>  "concept_class/123",
>>>  "concept_class/21414276-FB92-4BD9-5F06-9C461A0C0889",
>>>  "concept_class/64FA56EF-DAAF-B3EA-35C9-2DC3BDFE2542",
>>>  "concept_class/1D12485D-EF58-8895-0C32-839114DDEAF9",
>>>  "concept_class/802990F7-398B-F8EC-E23E-04DE7F4CBEEC",
>>>
>>>  
>>> "concept_class/972860E5-0529-C184-432D-2C9B2C03256E","concept_class/extension"]
>>>  
>>> SORT p_1.vertices[length(p_1.vertices)-1]['_ShowOrder'] asc 
>>>  return p_1
>>>
>>>
>>> Execute the aql above return nothing, just '[]'. But,if i move 
>>> "concept_class/123" out of the array after in operator, then  i can get the 
>>> result.
>>>  My arangodb version is 3.0.12 and 3.1.4.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ArangoDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to