Alan Burlison writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > > I'll be going through the ones we've claimed to have published and > > looking for (and fixing) broken ones. It'll take a long time, as I > > have to verify that the work was otherwise done right and only the > > "Exposure" value was set incorrectly. > > In the new version of the export script I'm creating a filed called > REDACTED.txt in each 'open' or 'manual' case directory that contains > files that haven't been published for any reason - too big, invalid > type, confidential contents etc. That should make it easier to figure > out why particular files haven't been published.
OK; that sounds like a useful enhancement. (I *think* what could be going on here is that when the tools were first deployed, some people may have thought that "manual" meant only "I manually changed this from closed to open," and not "the exposure of each file is individually controlled." Just a guess, though. It's quite a mess to clean up.) There are some cases where "manual" is justified, but the materials (for whatever reason) haven't been properly redacted. The "manual" flag isn't magic pixie dust, but it's been treated that way. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
