Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Note that the new filtering will not allow publication of cases whose > mail logs contain such garbage mail signatures as "This email message is > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > and privileged information."
This seems a bit of a drawback, and worth a filter to bounce messages back to avoid a bunch of cases inadvertently becoming closed. Is the filter triggering off "confidential" anywhere in the message (which would seem bad) or only in a signature or other intentional header? > Please make sure you remove any such nonsense from your .sig's before +1. Hugh.
