Alan Burlison writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > > No, that should be "open" exposure. When a case is "open," it's > > supposed to be white-listed. It's all open material, and people > > commenting on it are duty-bound to avoid doing non-open things. > > > > "Manual" exposure requires changes to the materials in order to open > > things, which requires more work. > > For 'manual' cases files need explicit tagging with a '.opensolaris. > suffix. And as you yourself have pointed out, this hasn't been done > properly. There are cases flagged as 'manual' with no '.opensolaris' > suffixes, which clearly shows that the 'manual' designation has been > sometimes been used improperly.
Actually, based on the cases that I've looked thorugh so far (I've fixed a few dozen of them), what it apparently shows is that for about two years, the tools were set up to mark all cases as "manual" by default, and none of the folks using the tools really understood the implications of that setting. It was designed to be an obscure case, and then it was used as the default! > > I think John Plocher tried to point that out earlier. > > I've repeatedly pointed out that the script is *not* just looking for > the word 'proprietary'. Please look at the redacted case list on > jurassic - the majority of cases have been redacted because they contain > the phrases "Sun Proprietary" or "Sun Confidential". I know you're not checking for just that one word. But your check *is* less stringent (and thus more encompassing) than the check that was there before. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677