On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:04 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > > > We're talking in the context of Solaris Next, as I understand it. If > > > the repository software is unable to deliver the functionality, then Sun > > > will likely find it hard to provide no matter how much I pay them. > > > > I'm still confused as to why software requirements are being proposed > > to ARC instead of pkg-discuss. > > these requirements have architectural implications for the whole of > solaris. they're in scope for the ARC.
Yes, but they should be proposed to the pkg project, and then proposed by the pkg project to ARC. The current way is backwards to me. -- Shawn Walker "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
