Alan Coopersmith writes: > > The same is likely true of LSARC. I'm not sure about the other parts > > of the ARC. > > The only LSARC wrinkle is that there's another type: open-but-not-opensolaris.
I think that applies to PSARC as well. > LSARC's current cases include the new JES installation framework that might > be relevant to whatever open source community JES is part of (java.net? > GlassFish?) and compiler cases that would be relevant to an OpenStudio > project if Studio is ever opened, but don't match any projects currently > being run through OpenSolaris. > > Almost all the JDS & X cases that go through LSARC should be open-by-default > (the Macromedia Flash 9 case being the only recent example I can think of to > be closed from either of those), as would various printing and system > management tools. Yep. I just don't see any particularly useful distinctions that the ARC could draw between "open-by-default" and "open-but-not- opensolaris." Other than perhaps getting the cc-lists right, why should the ARC necessarily care what community is involved? (And for that issue, all open cases smell the same; we need to know whom to copy.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
