James Carlson writes:
> More generally, here are the things that the ARC is normally
> interested in looking at (in inception and other reviews):
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/handbook/questionnaire/
A few more (perhaps helpful) things that I should have mentioned here:
- The ARC review process is intended to work fine with documentation
you already have. It should not be necessary to reformat or
restate things for ARC consumption. (Though, obviously, plain old
text is preferred by many members over any other format. It has
the broadest applicability and greatest longevity.)
- If you find you're spending more than an hour or two getting ready
for an ARC review, then something may be wrong. Consult with your
project case owner. The process is not at all intended to be
onerous. It _should_ just be a review of things that you'd
normally do anyway as part of normal development work.
- For full cases, the case owner is assigned automatically by the
ARC. This happens some time between case submission and the
inception review. If you need it to be done quickly (because you
have questions to ask), then drop a line asking for an owner, or
mention it in any ARC meeting.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
