I and others put a proposal together in early 2008. Perhaps this is a helpful place to start the discussion.
I've updated it for public dissemination, and attached it for your consideration. -tdc On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Asa Romberger wrote: > Some work has been happening on this already. > > Sebastien Roy wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:41 +0200, Darren Reed wrote: >> >>> Something that has been on my mind for a while is the state of the >>> tools that support PSARC (and the other ARCs) and if we should >>> do something about redesigning the infrastructure and replacing >>> them. >>> >>> I understand that nobody has time for this, but just for the sake of >>> a straw poll, what do other ARC folks feel about this? >>> >> >> Most people are of the opinion that the infrastructure and tools >> need to >> be updated in one way or another. Requirements first need to be >> gathered, and the work needs to be scoped out. >> >> -Seb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> arc-discuss mailing list >> arc-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/arc-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > arc-discuss mailing list > arc-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/arc-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/attachments/20091002/85110cfb/attachment-0002.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ARC.web proposal.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 156149 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/attachments/20091002/85110cfb/attachment-0001.pdf> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/attachments/20091002/85110cfb/attachment-0003.html>
