On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:20 +0000, Peter Howkins wrote: <snip>
> We don't need to extend the amount of config to store at runtime as we > don't extend the capabilities of the binary at runtime (all its > extensions are currently #define controlled). Should we ever impliment > a runtime dynamic linking system or similar for additional code then we > would need something more dynamic. But until that happens we're > overspeccing a very simple problem. I already have some of this kind of thing working. Plus, it'd be very handy if the RISC OS side could store configuration information in the back end. (Perhaps even have a GUI configuration tool in extnrom, for example.) So far, your implementation seems much more complex and difficult to maintain than my original suggestion. -- Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
