Ian Jeffray wrote: > Peter, > >> Please don't top-post. > > Understand common business practice and avoid the pettyness.
This is a serious development discussion. Proper inline posting means the points can actually be replied to. Unfortunately your response seems to be full of insults towards me, for whatever reason, so it's doubtful we'll make any progress here. > > riscos.info is not "private", any more than any other well-known >> > RISC OS site is. > It is private. It is, afaik, your personal website. No, my personal website is http://www.chocky.org/. riscos.info is a public RISC OS resource, with more than one admin (and which I happen to pay for). All the content is (or should) publically accessible, and substantial recent updates were not made by me. My intent is to make the relevant MySQL databases public too (especially the wiki). Indeed, what I really don't want is for it to turn into another riscos.org or riscos.net. No doubt you can find criticism in this arrangement, but I only have so much time. >> As a >>> contributor, supporter and user of this project, I do not support >>> this move. >> >> Are you saying you are contributing to this further? In particular, >> the ArcEm SF page links to: >> >> http://ian.jeffray.co.uk/gp2x/arcem001.zip >> >> Where is this now? Do you have plans to develop it further? > > Complain to whoever maintains the web page, not myself. Sorry you can't answer the question - it points to your webspace, does it still exist or not, and should the port be considered part of the project? > I've > not had a GP2X for years. Does this mean I'm not using ArcEm or > playing with other ports? No. I have no idea; that's why I asked. Your implication is that development is on going. I cannot guess the state of your GP2X involvement, especially if your website contains several projects for it. > Yes. The point is that you are widely known to steal projects, [insults] Sorry, I have no idea what this is about; nor is this the appropriate forum for you to air whatever repressed anger you have towards me, over things that presumably happened a very long time ago. Perhaps you can save this for private email. [more insults] Did you have anything constructive here towards the future of this project? I really am disappointed here that you couldn't show a more mature attitude. The point of this is nothing to do with my ego, as you so feel need to throw out. Rather, it's a response to looking over the various stagnating BBC resources now out there (and if we want to go back further, we can even draw a very rough comparison with the Domesday project). ArcEm has become yet another project which has a news item which is most recently from many years ago, promising future updates which are unlikely to happen. Obviously this is a contentious issue for you, but I fail to see how your attitude helps in the slightest. If I was so obviously cast in the mold for which are you insisting for me, then I would have just moved it, no questions asked. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
