Hi Cameron, The git repos look good to me - thanks!
If nobody else is going to volunteer to be an org owner, feel free to add me.
Cheers, - Jeffrey On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, Cameron Cawley wrote:
Hi I've gone ahead and done the conversion, and the result can be found here. https://github.com/ArcEm-emu There are two separate repositories - one for the application and one for the website. The ArcEm repository has all of the branches and merge commits have been generated using "git cvsimport", while the website is set up to deploy to https://arcem-emu.github.io/ . SourceForge appears to offer automatic mirroring of GitHub repositories so it would be good to set that up, but for now this will do. I haven't added any tags for past versions or attempted to migrate tickets over from SourceForge, but for now it should be at a point where development can continue and contributions can be accepted. I've invited all previous contributors with GitHub accounts to join the organization as members. It would be a good idea to also have a second organization owner in addition to myself - any volunteers? Regards Cameron On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 23:41, Cameron Cawley <ccawley2...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi I agree that it would be a good idea have a separate repository for the website. Chris’s conversion also looks helpful, so I’ll be sure to reference that. I’m also thinking it would be a good idea to try and fix up the automatic conversion to correctly handle the merge of the arcem-fast branch - in my conversion, it’s represented by a series of “Merge arcem-fast to trunk” commits, which isn’t too helpful when looking through the history. If there are no objections to this I’ll go ahead with the conversion at the weekend. Regards Cameron On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 23:09, Jeffrey Lee <m...@phlamethrower.co.uk> wrote: Hi, GitHub sounds good to me as well. I've got no objections to you doing the conversion yourself. But I also think that a few years ago someone else mentioned that they'd done a converison - probably Chris Young: https://github.com/chris-y/arcem At a brief look Chris's conversion is slightly better than your current one (https://github.com/ccawley2011/arcem) since he was able to include people's email addresses in the committer details. Searching GitHub also reveals a couple of other conversions where they've gone for just the emulator sources (i.e. the makefile & readme are in the root of the repo). That's probably worth considering - having separate repos for the emulator and the website. Cheers, - Jeffrey On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Cameron Cawley wrote: > Hi > I agree that GitHub would be preferable - in addition to it being more widely used these days (so > would potentially be more familiar to new contributors), it also has functionality like CI via GitHub > Actions that would be useful for ArcEm. > > If it's OK with the current project admins, I would be happy to attempt to do the conversion myself if > a lack of time is the main issue. > > Regards > Cameron > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 23:50, <i...@jeffray.co.uk> wrote: > > I’d vote for Github. Yes, it’s Microsoft, but ‘good things’ are there too. > > > > I. > > > > From: Cameron Cawley <ccawley2...@gmail.com> > Sent: 30 October 2023 23:46 > To: arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Migrating from CVS > > > > Hi > > > > Several years ago, there was some discussion about migrating the ArcEm repository from CVS to > Git or Subversion now that SourceForge has made all CVS repositories read only. Is there any > further update on this? > > > > I’d be happy to help with this if necessary. I’ve been working on updating the Windows port as > well as some new ones, so it would be nice to have everything submitted upstream. > > > > Regards > > Cameron > > > > >
-- arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
