On Jan 14, 2008 3:05 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Monday 14 January 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote: > | > I brought it up again since we've got the new logo on the site > | > now, and people are making noise on the forums to get the kernel > | > logo updated. People are just hard to please, heh. :P > | > > | > Anyway, a decision should be made - either take 'em out, or > | > update 'em. > | > | Well, Thayer has recommended we remove it because the logo loses > | most of the effect in the craptacular colors provided by the > | initial VGA framebuffer.... me, I'm neutral. I don't reboot enough > | for that image to be relevant. > > send me the SVG of the logo and i'll try to make a kernel logo that > tries to resemble the 24bit one. i did so for the last. > > the VGA framebuffer has a limited ammoutn of colours, you have to > dither them to make them look nice. > > arend we having also a black/white version that looks fine? and also a > grey version?
Does this help? http://www.cinderwick.ca/archer/ I didn't look too hard. There may be svg on there. If not I cc'd Thayer on here 8)
