> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:arch-dev-public- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Alexander Baldeck > Verzonden: maandag 21 januari 2008 15:17 > Aan: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development > Onderwerp: Re: [arch-dev-public] Mozilla status > > Aaron Griffin wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2008 9:28 AM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> BTW: How do we handle the mozilla /usr move, is it done yet, or do > we still > >> have a big mess (AFAIK half of mozilla was moved to extra on i686 > while it's > >> still in testing for amd64 :X) > > > > According to the list here: https://dev.archlinux.org/todo/44/ the > > recompiles are complete. > > > Yes, but something about the flashplugin was odd. I rebuilt it but due > to a static - not version dependend - release repository at Adobe, I > wasn't able to build a version that works with non-gtk ie. non-gecko > browsers. So, I would say for as long as flashplugin cannot be moved > down to extra, all geckos must stay in testing. Then again, I don't > know > if its maintainer was able to roll it back...
What error do you get when starting the new flash from konqueror or opera? Maybe we can workaround their broken binary with a patch in GTK and/or Glib again...
