On Jan 25, 2008 4:49 PM, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Friday 25 January 2008, Thayer Williams wrote: > | On Jan 25, 2008 12:53 AM PST, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Hi > | > I am fine with any logo, please just provide me 3 files as i > | > need them. thanks > | > greetings > | > tpowa > | > | All three versions of the kernel logo are available here: > | > | http://dev.archlinux.org/~thayer/art/kernel/archer-80x80-white/ > | > | I am not able to test the vga16 or monochrome versions, but it > | looks to me like we're not even building the kernel with support > | for these formats. For example, the kernel config in abs says: > | > | # CONFIG_FB_VGA16 is not set > | CONFIG_FB_VESA=y > | > | The CONFIG_FBCON_MFB flag (for monochrome support) appears to be > | missing entirely. > | > | Anyway, the new logos are 80x80, adhering to the default tux > | dimensions. > | > | Let me know if you guys have any questions or requests. > | > | Cheers > > hi Thayer, > hi Tobias, > hi all, > > i've made the 224 and 16 colour logo file for the kernel26 in colour > (yours is white, i would say that if we have colours and the logo is > in colour, we should use them - you agree?) and have tested both. > they work, Tobias, you can find them here for replacement of the old > logo in kernel26: > > http://dev.archlinux.org/~damir/temp/new_logo/ > > with the mono logo i have serious trouble: i cannot make the new logo > look nice in 1-bit space, it has edges and slopes that are hard to > show nicely in 120 x 120 px without aesthetic errors. but as the > monochrome framebuffer is anyway not built, i would not see this as > something urgent. > > @Tobias: feel free to replace the old logo by the new one
Uh, hold the phone here. I thought we explicitly brought Thayer on as our resident graphics guy.
