2008/2/9, Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We use xfs on our new fileservers. Testing revealed it's was the fastest > under our conditions, by a significant margin. > > We use ext3 other places, except in scenarios where there will be lots > of small files, in which case we favor reiserfs. I used to use reiserfs > for almost everything, but ext3 seems essentially as good in most cases > and the most reliable/stable of the bunch. > > There was one big xfs corruption issue about a year or so ago, which is > scary, but is has been otherwise very stable. I've had some problems > with reiserfs corruption, but they've been in very rare circumstances > where it also wasn't clear there wasn't some bad hardware involved. >
Just out of curiosity - did you compare XFS to JFS and what results you've observed? -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
