On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan McGee schrieb: > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Eric Belanger > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> > >> > Roman Kyrylych schrieb: > >> >> 2008/2/26, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >>> > In addition to a version bump, I changed the simple_firewall.rules > file > >> >>> > to a more generic and correct configuration. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Please sign off. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Seems to be OK here. Signoff i686. > >> >> > >> >> same here. > >> >> > >> > > >> > anyone for x86_64? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Man pages are not FSH compliant. No signoff from me. > > > > Do we have a namcap check for this yet? If not, the 'usr/man' part > > could be removed from directoryname.py and at least that check would > > then point out files in non-standard dirs. > > > > -Dan > > In the past we had makepkg move all manpages to /usr/man (for whatever > reason). Why don't we move them all to the FHS path now?
Because it was a hack in makepkg to move them. Regardless of where they end up, it is a hack to move things and I'd rather keep these hacks to a minimum. http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=9addd88a7d12c8c8445ec226e2837afe01e660b7 -Dan
