Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/3/5, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > just got that reqeust: > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9664 > > > > > > > > well i don't see a problem in adding it to [core], whats your > > > > opinion about it? > > > > > > Comments there, -1 from me. > > > > -1 from me as well, I think ppp+netcfg should handle this. *shrugs* > > I agree with these two. wvstreams, at the very least, seems goofy in > core. It's not exactly the first thing that comes to mind when I think > "core library"
request already rejected, so nothing to discuss here anymore. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
