Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee: > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Travis Willard > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Aaron Griffin > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Tobias Powalowski > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can i change fstab to: > > > > > > > /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto > > > > > > > ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd > > > > > > > /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 > > > > > > > /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 > > > > > > > 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me - just curious: what was it originally? Are > > > > > > we adding unhide? > > > > > > > > > > Pulling from /etc/fstab on gerolde, I'd say it used to look > > > > > like: > > > > > > > > > > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide > > > > > 0 0 /dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf > > > > > ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/fl > > > > > vfat user,noauto 0 0 > > > > > > > > > > Changed the filesystem types to 'auto', as the FS report asks. > > > > > > > > Wait wait.... removable media to auto means it will be mounted on > > > > boot.... that seems downright wrong. If you need ability to mount > > > > as a user, you probably want "users" in there > > > > > > auto FS TYPE, not auto mount. look at the noauto still in there in the > > > mount options. > > > > > > -Dan > > > > so what to do now? > > changing user to users too? and adding iocharset=utf8? > > or should this be left to the user to decide which options to use? > > Ah, ignore me - Dan found my confusion - apparently I can't read that > well. Yes, I am fine with the changes. Regarding the other iocharset > and whatnot changes... I think we're getting way too specific here. > The fstab should have sane defaults but not try to cover all bases. If > our users don't know how to edit a file, then we got bigger problems.
ok i'll checkin then, with the auto fs type only :) greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
