On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/3/10, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 2008/3/10, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2008/3/7, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to push out a 2008.03 initscripts package, and it will have > > > > > some fun changes from git and all, but I wanted to get a quick > show of > > > > > hands for pending issues. > > > > > > > > > > I know there are some bugs I think I will close out tonight, and > > > > > others are more complicated. > > > > > > > > > > Here are bugs closed in git (some of these are old and fixed in > 2008.02): > > > > > > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8392 (??) > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9451 > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4550 > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186 > > > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9726 > > > > > > > > > > I also added my name to the copyright lines. > > > > > > > > > > Anything else? > > > > > > > > > > > > > For FS#1186 - see my last comment, > > > > > > > > Some more reports: > > > > > > > > * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5880#comment22912 - I think this > > > > implementation is nice and KISS. > > > > > > > > * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9239 - I've been working with > bonding > > > > configurations in past 3 days on my new job, so I'm now feeling > pretty > > > > confident in how things work, assigning it to myself, for the next > > > > initscripts release. > > > > > > > > * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9636 - I think this can be fixed > > > > after the latest kernel goes to core by creating the needed nodes > > > > > > > > * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9700 - a reminder added an install > message > > > > > > > > > OK, anything else? I think I am going to bump this tonight in > > > preparation for the new ISO. > > > > > > > > > I won't be able to solve FS#9239 anytime sooner than the next night, > > and it's not critical, so it could go to next version. > > Could you compose some nice install message to get FS#9700 closed? > > > > Forgot to say that I don't know/remember any blocker issues, so feel > free to bump initscripts toonight.
Something came up. Won't be able to push this tonight unless someone else wants to (don't forget to the install message and git tags). We can always wait for 9239 anyway 8)
