On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 23:34 +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2008/3/14, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > > > > 2008/3/14, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > > >> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:50 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > >> > Hey guys keep cool, > > >> > following packages i would like to see in core: > > >> > > > >> > pending signoffs and move to base: > > >> > pmciautils? > > >> > just a small udev.rules fix waiting for signoff. > > >> > > > >> > initscripts? > > >> > bump to 2008.03 with the last changes from git > > >> > aaron and roman will add the final changes and then release a new > > version. > > >> > > > >> > pending signoffs and move to support: > > >> > wpasupplicant? > > >> > waiting for signoff > > >> > > > >> > fuse? > > >> > Thomas is there an issue atm? > > >> > waiting for signoff > > >> > > > >> > kbd? > > >> > Roman wanted to add some changes and additions to it, > > >> > this is not critical we could live with the old version too. > > >> > Roman until the other things are fixed/done you have time to get kbd > > working. > > >> > > > >> > madwifi/madwifi-utils? > > >> > switched back to trunk version, waiting for new responses, signoff > > >> > > > >> > delayed package moves due to rebuilds and issues: > > >> > gcc > > >> > build-toolchain > > >> > libtool > > >> > perl > > >> > > >> > > >> I consider the latest perl 5.10.0-3 pretty much complete. Except for > > >> zim and mod_perl there are no other complaints with the other official > > >> packages. I don't know the status of the community packages. > > > > > > Could you please notify Firmicus about the need of rebuilds so he > > > could package updated versions locally and then upload them to > > > community soon after you move perl out of testing. > > > This will help to avoid breakage of community perl packages > > > > > > > > > > > > I was about to suggest the same thing. A quick search for 'perl' on the > > AUR interface gave me over 200 results. As most of them are perl modules > > that will definitely needs to be rebuilt, we can expect that over 200 > > community package will need to be rebuilt. That is certainly a lot. IMO, > > it would be a good idea to keep perl in testing until community packages > > are locally ready. > > Firmicus already did local rebuilds, sergej was notified today.
Firmicus and I have chatted several times about the new perl - already keeping community in mind. -- K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
