Am Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 schrieb Roman Kyrylych: > 2008/3/19, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 22:57:15 schrieb Roman Kyrylych: > > >> People with hwclock errors - please confirm they've gone. > > > > > > Sorry, but the problem still exists. > > > > No signoff for x86_64 from me. The hwclock error is gone but the package > > was built on an i686 machine causing /sbin/minilogd to fail as reported > > in FS#9636. > > > > I can fix it if you want unless you want to wait to get a fix > > for Pierre. > > Damn, I've screwed things again. :-( > Sure, please fix it (-3.1?).
We have a problem in creation the rtc0 device, on Pierres machine 252 is not working but 253 on my machine 253 is not working but 252, since those numbers are local numbers which are reserved for local use it's difficult to guess which number works on which system. me shrugs greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
