On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:34:37AM +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > > Hi > to reconsider, you were the guys that wanted those filesystem stuff in the > kernel, > I just add/fix hardware support which doesn't conflict with such stuff, so > figure out how to fix it send patches that it works for the stuff you need > it. > Checkout Aufs from latest CVS and try to combine it that it works. > I don't use any of this filesystems. > Ok, let's assume for right now that we aren't going to drop either of them. Would you, as the kernel maintainer, prefer the in-tree solution of effectively aliasing the function names; or the out-of-tree solution of patching aufs to deal with unionfs's function names? Either will work just fine.
-S
pgpQZOWEqIrKE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
