On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 08:38:27 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > > > > > can we start signoff for this now? > > > > signed-off (both arches) > > No signoff from me, this breaks our agreed kernel patching policy. [1] > > -Dan > > [1] Start of thread: > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-November/003055.html > Last message with results: > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-November/003135.html > Other reference wrt minor version patches: > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-December/003782.html >
If this atl patch can live outside the kernel, then it should remain outside. If it's never going to be merged, all the more reason. I thought the undervolting patch had been knocked back and removed? what happened there? Some of those patches have been there for a long time, why are they still there? (eg: toshiba-bluetooth) James
