On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Travis Willard wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:54 AM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 4/3/08, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > So, what do I need from you? Nothing. I'm making this easy in > that I > > > > > will do all the work. I just need one thing: give me a day when > it is > > > > > best. When you all want to take a mini-vacation and do no > packaging at > > > > > all. If no one has a good day for this, I will probably do it on > > > > > Thursday or Friday. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, so. I need to fly out for a business trip tonight (anyone in Vegas > > > > today and tomorrow?). I was hoping to actually do this today, but > that > > > > fell through. I will be back on Saturday, so I plan on doing this > > > > then, starting about 10am CST on Saturday. > > > > > > > > One request: > > > > Could you guys take a peek at the web-based viewers out there and let > > > > me know what you'd prefer? > > > > Items of interest: > > > > http://www.bluestatic.org/software/viewsvn/ > > > > http://www.viewvc.org/ > > > > http://websvn.tigris.org/ > > > > http://trac.edgewall.org/ > > > > > > I don't think trac would be a good fit, as it does wiki and bugtracking > too. > > > > I really haven't ever used anything other than ViewVC so I don't have > > a good basis for comparison. > > > > However, this brings up an interesting (if somewhat offtopic, sorry) > > point - if we used Trac, could we integrate our package bugtracking > > directly with our repo, so that the issue could associate itself with > > the package in SVN? Would that even be useful? There was talk about > > how flyspray sucked recently, IIRC, so this could be an integrated > > replacement. > > In general I'm not happy with Trac's wiki and bug tracker. Trac took all > the simplest stuff and put it together so none of it is really good, it's > just combined.
Fair enough - glad to hear from someone with experience in the matter. I was just throwing it out there as a possibility. :)
