On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 07:56:27PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which was one of my suggestions, only I wouldn't use labels, but uuids (not > > every partition has a label, all have uuids). > > > > However, every other udev update breaks labels and uuids for device-mapper > > devices (like lvm), so we'd need exceptions for those (they have persistant > > names anyway) ... all not that pretty. > > I like the idea of using uuid's too.. it won't be too pretty, but it > will give us a default that works. People can always change it to > /dev/sda3 if they want > > I would say: use UUIDs and document where and when breakage occurs > (device-mapper). Let's face it, a vast majority of people probably > don't use lvm or crypto devices... and those that do are knowledgeable > enough to know they may need special configuration dances > Done and done. Changes are in my git tree. Still need to hit the docs [with a sledgehammer].
-S
pgpIrqxZXhcce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
