Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I don't mind wether we keep the rest in the unstable repo or move them in extra. If we move them in extra, we could add "Developement version" at the end of the package description to inform the user.I'm fine with this here, if you all want to do it. I've only ever used mplayer-svn once, and not for too long. /me shrugs
It seems Pierre is indifferent, Andy is fine with moving his -devel packages to extra and Eric and Tobias didn't really give an opinion.
It seems like everyone is indifferent :) As for me, I don't think using a separate repository for a handfull of -devel packages is necessary - for some of those packages, the name "unstable" would keep users from using them even if they're perfectly safe to use.
IMO, having "Development Version" in the description and a -devel in the pkgname is enough (we should rename firefox3 to firefox-devel).
If I am the only one with a strong opinion on this one, I will make the move next weekend or shortly after that, the unstable repository will be empty then.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
