On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Roman Kyrylych >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> 2008/5/22 Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> On 5/21/08, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> However, now that you mentioned swt, it brings up a good point. We >>>>>> can't do this for things like flashplugin just yet. So, should I >>>>>> create some sort of list of packages to NEVER generate sources for? >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be a good idea to implement a blacklist. A lot of >>>>> factors may warrant its use (size, license, version, etc.) >>>> >>>> Hmm, I can only think about packages that we have >>>> a special permission to redistribute for: >>>> virtualbox-additions in Community and (I may be totally wrong here) >>>> flashplayer in Extra), don't know about others. >>>> (BTW both packages' "source" and binary are almost the same) >>>> What I don't know if redistribution from out site covers our mirrors too. >>> >>> Ok, so this ran for all repos. I blacklisted a few known bad ones >>> (bash and readline, the mirror used for the source is borked), and the >>> following huge list of packages failed: >>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/sources/failed.pkgs >>> >>> Take a second and scan these please - if you can, please correct the source. >>> As Eric pointed out elsewhere, we can merge source change from trunk >>> with archrelease, without the need to re-release the package (this >>> will fix abs too) >>> >> >> Keep in mind there's probably dupes, as it runs for both x86_64 and >> i686 (and checks for an existing source for the correct version). Let >> me try to clean those up real quick >> > > Sorted. 431 packages: > http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/sources/failed.pkgs
Hm - that's cool and all, but I'm finding it hard to grep. Want me to make a todo list?
