On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Andreas Radke wrote:
We should try to clean up testing faster. I want to start the next big
rebuild session for "db". Before that we should sort out what
packages can be moved or deleted completely or what holds it back.
I asked dolby to make up lists for a testing repo cleanup that I wanted to
do. I haven't heard from him yet. I guess he was just busy with the
bugtracker. I was very busy as well. I posted a few comments below.
Here's the current ftp list for i686-testing:
1.7M Apr 4 23:00 exiv2-0.16-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
That exiv2 has a soname bump. All packages that needed a rebuilt (haven't
check the bug tracker) are in testing as well. They've been there for a
couple of months.
Neri: Can they be moved to extra?
742K Apr 8 02:35 openssh-5.0p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
openssh-5.0p1-1 is already in core. this can be removed from testing.
118K May 4 18:31 sudo-1.6.9p15-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Paul and I forgot to start the signoff thread for it. It's now out-of-date.
52K May 23 20:37 mlocate-0.20-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
has been signoffed. I asked for status in its signoff thread today.
mplayer-svn-25449-1
Tom: are you still maintaining it? This is a couple of month old. The current
package in unstable is even older. IMO, it should be removed if it's not
actively maintained anymore. A couple months old svn package is pointless.
BTW, I was working on a gpm soname bump. The x86_64 packages are ready and I
was planning to move them in testing tonight with the i686 ones to follow
later tonight or tomorrow. At least one of the rebuilt package for gpm also
depends on db. We might not want to mix the 2 soname bump and do the db
rebuild when the gpm one will be removed from testing. I was planning to
keep the gpm in testing for a week or two to make sure I didn't miss any
packages that needed to be rebuilt and because the rebuilt mc package will
also have major changes/bug fixes.
Is there something where I can help out?
-Andy
Greg sent me his list. I cleanup some packages which were in both core and
testing with the same version. I also moved dssi (it was part of
the qt4 update) and k3b (old bugfix FS#9051) to extra.
##x86_64
#core packages
man-pages 3.00-1 andyrtr
sudo 1.6.9p15-1 already out of date
#gpm rebuild
aalib 1.4rc5-5
brltty 3.7.2-2
elinks 0.11.4rc1-3
fte 20051115-3
gstreamer0.10-good-plugins 0.10.8-3
gvim 7.1.315-1
jed 0.99.18-4
lde 2.6.1-3
links 2.1pre36-2
mc 4.6.1-5
vi 7.1.315-1
vim 7.1.315-1
xaos 3.3-2
xemacs 21.5.28-4
#exiv2 rebuild
digikam 0.9.3-2
exiv2 0.16-2
gimp-ufraw 0.13-2
gwenview 1.4.2-2
kipi-plugins 0.1.5beta1-3
libkexiv2 0.1.6-3
#qt
lyx 1.5.5-1
liborigin 20070926-1 already out of date
libassuan 1.0.4-2
psi 0.12.svn1160-1
psi-i18n 0.12-1
qca 2.0.0.svn817733-1
qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1
qt 4.4.0-4
soprano 2.0.98-1
strigi 0.5.10-1
#
archboot 2008.03-2 tpowa
mkbootcd 2008.03-1
mkpxelinux 2008.03-1 tpowa
mksyslinux 2008.03-1
cpufreqd 2.2.1-2 only in x86_64 testing
motion 3.2.9-1 moving it to extra would fix FS#10652
#old packages
eigen 1.0.5.svn744389-1 tpowa
exim 4.68-4 already out of date
hpoj 0.91-12 tpowa
kismet 2007_10_R1-1 j.chu
nasm 2.01-1 pkrakture
pinentry 0.7.3-2 tpowa already out of date
redland 1.0.7-1 tpowa
#other
dnsmasq 2.41-2 already out of date
kdelibs 3.5.9-4 pierre
##i686 diff
#old pkgs
ivtv-utils 1.0.2-1 paul already out of date
mplayer-svn 25449-1
#xorg
xf86-video-apm-1.2.0-1
xf86-video-ark-0.7.0-1
xf86-video-ati-6.8.0-3
xf86-video-chips-1.2.0-1
xf86-video-savage-2.2.0-1
xf86-video-tdfx-1.4.0-1
xf86-video-trident-1.3.0-1
xf86-video-unichrome-0.2.6-7
xf86-video-via-0.2.2-4
qimageblitz 0.0.3.svn807093-1 !not in i686 only x86_64
==================================
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
