On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Simo Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:23:37PM -0300, Hugo Doria wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did not saw this patch before, but it seems to solve all the >> problems and add support for i18n very well. I think that now is just >> a matter of wait for the patch be officially added and open a call for >> translators. >> > > Well... there's a couple factors at play here. My working branch at > code.neotuli.net has a whole ton of changes in it, and will be getting > even more as I clean up the codebase, so any patches aren't going to > apply cleanly for very long. > > That said, i18n is definitely something we want to add immediately after > we finish shuffling code around. Also, I was wondering whether we should > use gettext, or whether we should use bash's builtin i18n mechanism > (which is poorly documented, but easy to use). Do you know any drawbacks > to using it?
bash has a builtin i18n mechanism? Can you elaborate? I've never heard of this
