On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:24:01 -0400
schrieb Dale Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Why even package 2.6.25.11 for i686 if it's the same as 2.6.25.10?
Seems like a waste of time/bandwidth.
Dale
Maybe you are right. But I'm only helping out here on kernel stuff and
I'm not sure if this change doesn't touch i686 architecture at all:
Makefile | 2 +-
include/asm-x86/desc.h | 4 ++--
And we always want to satisfy our users with all the latest release
even if they won't get any gain ;)
2.6.26 is out anyway though, so why bother?
-Dan
FWIIW, signoff i686
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
