On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:34 -0400, Dale Blount wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:52 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > 2008/7/22 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:32 PM, K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Sorry about the multiple pkgrels for i686. When Paul said libcap was > > >> missing I didn't realize it was never used in earlier releases. > > >> > > >> I still haven't seen any concrete signoffs - just a conditional one from > > >> Paul for i686. I'll migrate the packages in a few days regardless. > > > > > > Ping, now that this vulnerability is in the wild, can we try and get > > > some signoffs ASAP. > > > > It has been signed off by Paul. > > And now there is exploint in the wild! > > So please move it out of testing ASAP. > > > > I'll add a i686 signoff, but it looks like we still need a x86_64 signoff. > Anyone who can test, please hurry. This exploit is getting more dangerous by > the minute.
Dig works fine on x86_64, so signoff for that. I'm not using bind itself, so I can't test. Though we don't have enough signoffs for x86_64, please move this thing quickly, either with or without signoffs. If x86_64 would be broken, we would have bugreports for that already.
