On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it > a lot when playing with glibc upgrades that often break the dynamic > pacman. Is there any replacement?
It also ended up being pretty useful when pacman started linking against libarchive and libdownload (libfetch?), IIRC - of course, that was compounded by a pacman issue (it didn't download its own deps when upgrading itself) that has since been fixed.
