On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
update initscripts when they updated udev.... or something.. I can't
remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting
their systems to boot fine.
Is everyone ok with removing it?
A suggestion was made 3 times to simply add a conflict line :
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11112#comment31331
This is just a safety against foolish people.
Added locally.
Copied from arch-general (whoops, replied to the wrong list) regarding
the readme file we ship with the udev package
Actually, I think we should remove this file. Reloading rules and all
that is covered by the man pages and any arch specific documentation
should be added to a wiki page so anyone can edit it.
Any issues with removing this? We don't ship custom readme's with any
other packages that I know of.
I do ship a custom readme for qingy. At first, I was pointing people to
the wiki article I had created. Then, I got somewhat uneasy about having
to rely on a document that anyone can edit (qingy is a login manager so
it's somewhat critical) even though I was receiving email notification
everytime the article was edited. Therefore, I put the wiki info in a
readme. In the case of udev, if you want to rely on the wiki, someone
should watch the article edits carefully.
Additionally, do we need the migrate-udev script anymore? I sincerely
hope not. Any qualms with killing THAT off too?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
