2008/9/28 Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Eduardo Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 14:57 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: >>>> I have disabled all line wrapping to prevent broken config files like >>>> this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290 >>>> >>>> -Please signoff (also ncurses related) >>>> >>>> -Andy >>> Just a thought, and I hope is not too late. Wouldn't it be better to >>> make the installer use 'nano -w' instead of just 'nano'? We have just >>> removed a functionality from the nano package by disabling line wrapping >>> from the package itself. Also, I'm having a hard time getting used to >>> not type, 'nano -w' when I want to edit a file, that command just >>> doesn't work anymore. >> >> I apparently had line wrapping turned on in my /etc/nanorc too that >> yelled at me. I kinda agree with Eduardo here. Maybe we should >> re-enable this. > > There's a bug about missing -w in installer: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11468 > So should we add -w to installer and re-enable word-wrapping in nano, > or should I close this bugreport as "Fixed" now?
I've just closed it as a duplicate of http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11290 but still the proper fix would be to use nano -w in installer instead of disabling -w in nano, IMO. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
